Skip to content
LinkMedic project interface
Partial

Public pages and primary sources were checked, but the core workflow was not independently completed or audited.

LinkMedic

What is worth noticing is not the medical metaphor, but a narrow maintenance flow for broken links, status codes, response times, scheduled rechecks, and alerts. Its public pages still conflict on outbound-link checking, anchor validation, robots.txt, history retention, and pricing, so authorization and crawl boundaries need confirming before scanning any site you do not control.

Original author
Uneed publisher stoki (LuckyHacky) / service operator Martin Štuka
Last verified
2026-07-18

01 / ANALYSIS

Product analysis

Verification profile
Maturity
Commercial
Confidence
Partial
Verified
2026-07-18
Commercial relation
Not sponsored

Problem solved

Broken links, failed redirects, and server errors accumulate as content and external destinations change. Many site owners do not need a full SEO suite; they need to know what broke, where it appears, when it changed, and what to fix first.

Why it was selected

The public site shows the URL-entry flow without an install, and real maker-uploaded screens show saved sites, health scores, status codes, response times, and pricing. At verification, the free tier listed one project and one new monthly scan with ten URLs per project. Monthly tiers were $9.99, $19.99, $29.99, and $99.99 for 100, 250, 500, and unlimited URLs; annual totals were $99.99, $199.99, $299.99, and $999.99. Prices and limits can change, and we did not enter checkout.

What is genuinely novel

Cloud link crawling, email alerts, and PDF reports are not new. The clearer product choice is the narrow sequence: diagnose one URL, keep projects by site, show a health score and issue table, then connect discovery to maintenance through scheduled rechecks.

Best for

Independent developers, bloggers, and small agencies that want recurring checks for broken links, redirects, and server errors and will first verify crawl scope, data retention, and plan limits

Editorial evaluation

Problem insightstrong
Originalitymedium
Executionmedium
Transferabilitystrong

KEEP DISCOVERING

A few more products worth noticing

A small set selected by product shape and profile similarity, with independent verification records.

Browse all products

02 / WHAT STANDS OUT

Three product decisions worth noticing

01

Connect one diagnosis to ongoing maintenance

A broken-link tool is more than an error list. Saved baselines, newly introduced issues, impact ordering, and owner alerts turn repair into a sustainable workflow.

02

The crawler needs its own safety contract

Before allowing a scan, verify domain ownership or explicit authorization and make robots.txt, rate, concurrency, path exclusions, and a stop control visible and auditable.

03

Generate product claims from one source of truth

Outbound scope, history retention, URL limits, discounts, and domain metadata should derive from versioned configuration so the FAQ, pricing, replies, and site metadata stay aligned.

Product insight worth carrying forward

Before the first scan, show a confirmable crawl contract: who authorized it, allowed domains and paths, robots.txt behavior, request rate, JavaScript execution, outbound-link and anchor handling, and result retention. Then order findings by fixability and impact.

03 / DO NOT COPY

What not to copy

Do not promise a crawler will never create load without publishing rate, concurrency, robots.txt, and stop behavior; the safety boundary should be verifiable.
Do not treat 'enter any URL' as harmless convenience and shift responsibility only in legal text. Verify authorization, constrain scope, and retain an audit record in the product flow.

04 / LIMITS & RISKS

Limits and risks

The current FAQ says outbound links are checked, while the maker's reply on the Uneed launch page says outbound links are filtered and target anchors are not validated. These may describe different versions, but the public pages do not say so. The FAQ also lists path exclusions and honoring a target site's robots.txt as future work, while the terms allow any URL and shift scanning consequences to the user; the service should therefore not be tried on an unauthorized domain. The privacy page lists account, billing, IP, and login data but not target URLs, project settings, scan results, crawl logs, alert content, processors, or their retention. Saying in the FAQ that results are private does not explain deletion or isolation. The pricing table marks history retention for every tier while the FAQ says paid plans unlock full history; the annual toggle says 20% off even though the published yearly totals are about 16.6% below twelve monthly payments. Page canonicals and the robots.txt sitemap also point to linkmedic.com, which currently returns 404, while the live service is on linkmedic.io, and the legal pages show no visible effective date.

Compared with alternatives

Compared with full SEO suites such as Ahrefs or Semrush, it is narrower, easier to understand, and has a lower entry price. Compared with Screaming Frog or open-source CLIs, it moves scheduled runs, history, and email alerts into the cloud but exposes fewer public controls. The FAQ says it analyzes standard HTML and SSR, so purely client-rendered links may be missed, and configurable path exclusions are not yet available. Limits from ten to 500 URLs across free through Pro make it a small-site check rather than a complex crawl audit.

05 / EVIDENCE

Visual evidence

Publisher-uploaded LinkMedic diagnostic results showing health score, total scans, dead links, and warnings
An original maker image from LinkMedic's current Uneed launch page. It shows the diagnostic summary and per-URL results, but sample data does not establish crawl completeness or status accuracy.
Publisher-uploaded LinkMedic site-project view showing account summary and two website project cards
Maker-published project-management interface. It verifies how multiple sites and plan capacity are presented; we did not sign in or test project isolation, history, or deletion.
Publisher-uploaded LinkMedic pricing page showing Free, Basic, Specialist, Pro, and Enterprise plans
Maker-published pricing interface matching the live five-tier structure and monthly prices at verification. Pricing can change, and we did not open Freemius checkout.

06 / SOURCE

Source and verification

Original author
Uneed publisher stoki (LuckyHacky) / service operator Martin Štuka
Country / region
Czech Republic
Maturity
Commercial
Confidence
Partial
Discovered
2026-07-18
Last verified
2026-07-18

What this review checked

We verified the live home, pricing, FAQ, privacy, terms, registration, robots.txt, and response headers; the Uneed launch page and maker reply; and three original product images uploaded by the publisher. We did not submit a URL, trigger the crawler, create or access an account, verify email, complete Turnstile, connect a site, generate a report, subscribe, or pay, so crawl coverage, rate behavior, alerts, isolation, report accuracy, cancellation, and refunds remain independently untested.

Latest change

Initial profile created from the live site, pricing, FAQ, privacy, terms, robots.txt, maker statements, and three original maker images; no URL was submitted, crawler triggered, account created, or payment made, and outbound-link, anchor, authorization, robots.txt, retention, pricing, and domain-configuration boundaries are recorded.

Ready to explore further?

Open the product, or return to the original source to verify the details.

ONE-TAP FEEDBACK

Did this profile help you judge the product?

One tap. No writing required.