CARD · Card record
MiniMind: learn how a small language model is trained
MiniMind provides a roughly 64M-parameter model and training tutorials. Its “two hours” refers to one supervised fine-tuning epoch on a single RTX 3090.
01
THE STORY · The original
Read the explanation and its limits.
For learning the training process: start with examples and hardware requirements.
- Originalattention signalhttps://github.com/jingyaogong/minimind
Why it is worth understanding
Use a small exercise to connect data, settings and outputs. Choose it for a clear learning goal, rather than its chart position.
Conditions and limitations
The timing is a maintainer report under specific conditions, not the full training workflow. We have not reproduced it; Star counts do not establish results or production suitability.
Important additions and corrections
Dates below mark changes to our coverage.
- Addition ·
Clarified the training conditions: “two hours” means one supervised fine-tuning epoch on an RTX 3090, not the full training process.
Reading progress is saved in this browser. Save or add a note →
02
THE THREAD · Full timeline
1 event, every row traceable.
A card accumulates records as its story develops: new corroborators, market contrasts, material changes at the original — each dated and linked to its archive day.
- RecordGitHub weekly Trending ranked #5, recording 3,649 stars for the week.
03
SOURCES · Sources and evidence
Check each link's purpose and limits.
Sources and evidence · 2 links
Each link has a purpose and scope. Link counts do not establish independent confirmation; direct support applies only to the statements specified below.
Teaching scope and timing conditions.
Limits: Maintainer documentation; no independent training run.
- GitHub weekly TrendingScope not documented
A per-link statement of support has not been attached.
04
EDITORIAL REVIEW
Review of this card's wording and evidence.
Editorial review · Evidence reviewed
· Beijing time (UTC+8)
Read source materials to clarify purpose and limits. Discovery and event dates are retained; editorial review is not an independent experiment.
This dates our review of the card's wording and evidence, not a project release or product update.