CARD · Card record

Help coding agents write Go for your project version

JetBrains’ guidelines tell coding agents to read go.mod before choosing language and standard-library features. They aim to avoid outdated patterns and code that requires a newer Go version than the project uses.

01
THE STORY · The original

Read the explanation and its limits.

Read the project’s Go version first, then give the coding agent matching guidance.

  • Originalattention signalhttps://github.com/JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines

Why it is worth understanding

If you maintain Go projects with AI, test the guidance on common refactors and look for fewer incompatible suggestions. The project’s target version should determine which features are used.

Conditions and limitations

The guidelines do not guarantee agent compliance or replace compilation, static analysis and tests. The installer’s Go requirement is separate from the project version it should respect. We have not tested the results. Star counts and weekly rank reflect attention, not adoption or results.

Important additions and corrections

Dates below mark changes to our coverage.

  • Correction ·

    Withdrew a generic conclusion inferred from the rankings and explained the guidelines in terms of the project’s target Go version.

Reading progress is saved in this browser. Save or add a note →

02
THE THREAD · Full timeline

1 event, every row traceable.

A card accumulates records as its story develops: new corroborators, market contrasts, material changes at the original — each dated and linked to its archive day.

Card timeline
  1. RecordGitHub weekly Trending ranked #4, recording 1,403 stars for the week.

03
SOURCES · Sources and evidence

Check each link's purpose and limits.

Sources and evidence · 3 links

Each link has a purpose and scope. Link counts do not establish independent confirmation; direct support applies only to the statements specified below.

Found an error or a problem? Send feedback ↗

04
EDITORIAL REVIEW

Review of this card's wording and evidence.

Editorial review · Corrected

· Beijing time (UTC+8)

Clarify the distinction between Star counts and actual adoption or outcomes.

This dates our review of the card's wording and evidence, not a project release or product update.

Review sources and full receiptFull receipt: before, after and review evidence (JSON)

Previous editorial correction (JSON)