Supabase Blog first-party post · Published 2026-08-24

Supabase adds centralized access management for Claude

Supabase’s enterprise-managed authorization lets an admin approve the Claude connection centrally while members keep their existing Supabase roles and project permissions.

After admin approval, members sign into Claude with company identity and access authorized Supabase projects with existing permissions.
Graphic 1/2: access follows each member’s existing role and project permissions. · Open full-size image

中文

Approve centrally, retain member permissions

Supabase’s August 24 announcement describes central approval of the Claude connection. Members sign in with company identity and retain their existing Supabase roles and project access, including developer and read-only roles.

中文

Plan and configuration requirements

The announced setup requires Team or Enterprise plans on both Supabase and Claude, with Okta SSO configured.

The documentation checked on September 9 requires ID-JAG support from the identity provider and explicit MCP-client authorization by an organization owner. Configuring the issuer alone does not grant client access. Requests remain within existing member permissions; the announcement lists SCIM provisioning as a future plan.

Plan and identity requirements for Supabase and Claude, checked ID-JAG and client authorization prerequisites, and planned SCIM provisioning.
Graphic 2/2: announcement requirements and subsequently checked documentation have separate dates. · Open full-size image

Important additions and corrections

Dates below mark changes to our coverage.

  • Addition ·

    Added the plan and identity requirements for managed authorization: SSO alone is insufficient; ID-JAG support and explicit client authorization are required.

Sources and notes

sources中文

Sources and notes

Retained summary and context

Teams with managed identity can let Claude project access follow employees’ existing Supabase permissions.

SSO alone is insufficient: current docs also require an identity provider supporting ID-JAG and explicit client authorization. Plan and client requirements apply. SCIM remains planned, and we have not tested costs or management outcomes.

Sources and evidence · 4 links

Each link has a purpose and scope. Link counts do not establish independent confirmation; direct support applies only to the statements specified below.

Source timeline
  1. · Found this reading link via Supabase Blog.
Collection record

First discovered:

Collection and source publication have distinct dates.

Editorial record

Sources reviewed

· Beijing time (UTC+8)

Reviewed official materials to clarify purpose, changes and usage conditions, distinguishing source descriptions from untested results. Original publication and observation dates are retained; an editorial revision is not a new product release.

Sources and full record

This dates our review of the wording and sources, not a project release or product update.

Full record: before, after and sources (JSON)

Previous source review (JSON)

Corrections and feedback