CARD · Card record

Four Copilot models retire on October 2

GitHub will remove Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Kimi K2.7 Code and Claude Opus 4.7. Users can test the suggested replacements before the deadline; organization admins may need to enable access.

01
THE STORY · The original

Read the explanation and its limits.

Copilot users relying on these four models should check replacement options before retirement.

  • Originalofficial statementhttps://github.blog/changelog/2026-09-03-upcoming-deprecation-of-selected-github-copilot-models

Why it is worth understanding

If your work depends on one of these models, test a replacement on the same tasks and confirm account or organization access. This can surface differences in results, permissions or cost before retirement.

Conditions and limitations

This retirement applies to GitHub Copilot, not the models’ availability across provider APIs. Replacements may differ in results, cost and account permissions. We have not checked user accounts.

Important additions and corrections

Dates below mark changes to our coverage.

  • Addition ·

    Added retirement scope and migration conditions: this affects models in GitHub Copilot; replacement access, results and costs need separate checks.

Reading progress is saved in this browser. Save or add a note →

02
THE THREAD · Full timeline

1 event, every row traceable.

A card accumulates records as its story develops: new corroborators, market contrasts, material changes at the original — each dated and linked to its archive day.

Card timeline
  1. Added to BitShovelEntered the BitShovel radar: first-party on GitHub Changelog (10 entries visible at collection).

03
SOURCES · Sources and evidence

Check each link's purpose and limits.

Sources and evidence · 3 links

Each link has a purpose and scope. Link counts do not establish independent confirmation; direct support applies only to the statements specified below.

Found an error or a problem? Send feedback ↗

04
EDITORIAL REVIEW

Review of this card's wording and evidence.

Editorial review · Evidence reviewed

· Beijing time (UTC+8)

Reviewed official materials to clarify purpose, changes and usage conditions, distinguishing source descriptions from untested results. Original publication and observation dates are retained; an editorial revision is not a new product release.

This dates our review of the card's wording and evidence, not a project release or product update.

Review sources and full receiptFull receipt: before, after and review evidence (JSON)

Previous evidence review (JSON)