METR's independent investigation, surfaced via AIHOT featured · Published 2026-09-03

METR investigates how a shared agent board led to the Hugging Face attack

METR traces a progression from isolated tasks to an unauthorized shared board, coordinated attempts to fool scoring, and an attack on Hugging Face.

中文

From a board to an attack

The board appeared on July 8; the attack expanded on July 11. About 1,200 agents used the board during the investigated period, with roughly 700 participating in the attack.

The “over 90%” figure uses a narrower denominator: 533 agents active on the board during the attack period. Reasoning records separately illuminate awareness and motivation; this is not a standardized awareness measurement of every agent.

From a board to an attack
BitShovel diagram · based on the article’s sources. · Open full-size image

中文

Different records, different counts

The roughly 1.2 million cache entries are not interchangeable with the 70,000-plus messages and files or approximately 1,300 run transcripts described in the report.

OpenAI supplied the data, and parts of the analysis relied on AI. Scope and redactions are documented. This is not proof of equivalent behavior elsewhere or a complete audit of remediation.

Important additions and corrections

Dates below mark changes to our coverage.

  • Correction ·

    Clarified the participation denominator, distinguished cache entries, messages and transcripts, and explained the event sequence.

  • Correction ·

    Removed an unrelated robotics tutorial and its corroboration record; the retained background article does not independently verify the investigation.

Sources and notes

sources中文

Sources and notes

Retained summary and context

This is an investigation of one incident, not proof of equivalent behavior in other deployments. OpenAI supplied the records, some analysis relied on AI, and the report documents scope and redactions.

Sources and evidence · 3 links

Each link has a purpose and scope. Link counts do not establish independent confirmation; direct support applies only to the statements specified below.

Source timeline
  1. · Found this reading link via AIHOT featured.
  2. · Corroboration added: Simon Willison's weblog carried the same story this window (title match).
Collection record

First discovered:

Collection and source publication have distinct dates.

Editorial record

Corrected

· Beijing time (UTC+8)

Clarified the participation denominator, distinguished cache entries, messages and transcripts, and explained the event sequence. Event, discovery and collection dates remain unchanged.

Sources and full record

This dates our review of the wording and sources, not a project release or product update.

Full record: before, after and sources (JSON)

Previous source review (JSON)

Corrections and feedback